The Great Rejection

I’ve recently read that you should collect 100 rejection letters per year on Literary Hub. 100!? That sounds like something I’ve heard before, and it’s called crazy – “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting different results.” Albert Einstein.

But after reading and marinating on it all evening, there is a method to their madness. If you have multiple pieces circulating, and then you edit the rejections and re-submit for round 2, 3, 4…it would certainly be easy to rack up rejections. Especially considering the acceptance rate for journals is well below 10%, and in most cases less than 5%.


And so well, what do you know? I received another rejection letter today. But this one, this one is quite something. It is the BEST rejection letter I’ve ever received. I have a whole folder of the standard form…unfortunately, at this time we have decided not to blah blah blah, and while this one has that in there too…trim away the fat and right there, lying in the middle of the page is the juicy meat underneath that I’ve been craving…

“We are intrigued by the idea of the table as a map of life events. However, we do feel this story might benefit from additional editing. Unfortunately, The Mirage did not receive a unanimous vote for inclusion in the upcoming issue of From the Depths. With regret, I’m afraid we must decline, but we encourage you to submit again. We would be honored to read more.”

  1. Editing! Editing is the easy part really. It is crucial and can make or break a great piece, but finding the story, the characters, the dialogue, a voice, and compiling it into a succinct piece of writing that is entertaining is the hard part!
  2. “Did not receive unanimous vote for inclusion…” That means someone liked it. Someone read my work and thought it was good enough. Isn’t that what writers call SUCCESS!? I know that is part of my definition.
  3. “We would be honored to read more.” Nope, never received that in a rejection letter to date. Even if they are just being nice – I’ll take it!

And so, I’ll read this rejection letter 100 more times, nibbling and gnawing on it’s bones until I know I cannot ever forget the taste of it.

Posted by

We read to learn, to feel, to laugh, to understand others. We write to teach, express, communicate, to inspire others. I created Invisible Ink as an outlet of sorts, an area where I can organize the chaos; a place where hopefully I can be true to myself, and my readers. Writing is personal, it takes a brave and dedicated soul to formulate a piece and then share it with the world. That being said, I get just as much out of reading other's work as I do sharing mine ( I am always open to manuscript review swaps, just send me a message). Words read off a page evoke emotions. When taken out of context, or through an out of focus lens - anyone can mold the words, shifting their meaning to fit their agenda or distorted outlook. Staying true to form and myself, I won't censor my content, but I will censor my audience. Whatever lens you happen to be reading this through - I hope you enjoy!

I'd love to hear your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s